Banned Books Week has been around since 1982 with the distinct purpose of preserving the freedom to read. For many years, books have been challenged or even banned due to controversial content. Librarians, educators, authors, and publishers regularly attempt to bring awareness to the threat to control the type of material available to read.
"The books that the world calls immoral are books that show the world its own shame."
"So what does the current situation with regard to cancelling/challenging books tell us about what our contemporary societies most fear?...we seem to fear ambiguity and to crave absolute certainty."
"Let children read whatever they want and then talk about it with them. If parents and kids can talk together, we won't have as much censorship because we won't have as much fear."
"Let's be clear: censorship is cowardice...It masks corruption. It is a school of torture: it teaches, and accustoms one to the use of force against an idea,...But worst still, censorship destroys criticism, which is the essential ingredient of culture."
"You have to read, you have to know, you have to have access to knowledge."
"I'm not going to censor myself to comfort your ignorance."
"We change people through conversation, not through censorship."
"Censorship that comes from the outside assumes about people an inability to make reasoned choices."
"The case against censoring anything is absolute:..nothing that could be censored can be so bad in its effects, in the long run, as censorship itself."
Banned, challenged, and restricted for LGBTQIA+ content, and because it was considered to have sexually explicit images
Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content, profanity, and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
Banned, challenged, and restricted for depictions of abuse and because it was considered to be sexually explicit
Banned and challenged for profanity, violence, and because it was thought to promote an anti-police message and indoctrination of a social agenda
Banned and challenged for profanity, sexual references and use of a derogatory term
Banned and challenged because it was considered sexually explicit and degrading to women
Banned and challenged because it depicts child sexual abuse and was considered sexually explicit
Banned, challenged, relocated, and restricted for providing sexual education and LGBTQIA+ content.
Banned and challenged for LGBTQIA+ content and because it was considered to be sexually explicit.
Challenged, banned, and restricted for LGBTQIA+ content, conflicting with a religious viewpoint, and not reflecting “the values of our community.”
Banned and challenged because of the author’s public statements and because of claims that the book contains “selective storytelling incidents” and does not encompass racism against all people.
Banned and challenged for profanity, drug use, and alcoholism and because it was thought to promote antipolice views, contain divisive topics, and be “too much of a sensitive matter right now.”
Banned, challenged, and restricted because it was thought to contain a political viewpoint, it was claimed to be biased against male students, and it included rape and profanity.
Banned and challenged for profanity, sexual references, and allegations of sexual misconduct on the part of the author.
Challenged for “divisive language” and because it was thought to promote antipolice views.
Banned and challenged for racial slurs and their negative effect on students, featuring a “white savior” character, and its perception of the Black experience
Banned and challenged for racial slurs and racist stereotypes and their negative effect on students.
Banned and challenged because it was considered sexually explicit and depicts child sexual abuse.
Challenged for profanity, and because it was thought to promote an antipolice message.
Reasons: challenged, banned, restricted, and hidden to avoid controversy; for LGBTQIA+ content and a transgender character; because schools and libraries should not “put books in a child’s hand that require discussion”; for sexual references; and for conflicting with a religious viewpoint and “traditional family structure”
Reasons: challenged for LGBTQIA+ content, for “its effect on any young people who would read it,” and for concerns that it was sexually explicit and biased
Reasons: Challenged and vandalized for LGBTQIA+ content and political viewpoints, for concerns that it is “designed to pollute the morals of its readers,” and for not including a content warning
Reasons: Challenged, banned, and relocated for LGBTQIA+ content; for discussing gender identity and sex education; and for concerns that the title and illustrations were “inappropriate”
Reasons: Challenged and restricted for featuring a gay marriage and LGBTQIA+ content; for being “a deliberate attempt to indoctrinate young children” with the potential to cause confusion, curiosity, and gender dysphoria; and for conflicting with a religious viewpoint
Reasons: Challenged and relocated for LGBTQIA+ content, for a transgender character, and for confronting a topic that is “sensitive, controversial, and politically charged”
Reasons: Banned and challenged for profanity and for “vulgarity and sexual overtones”
Lone Star College-University Park • Student Learning Resource Center
20515 SH 249 • Building 12, 8th Floor • Houston, TX 77070
This work by Lone Star College-University Park Library is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 